The reason why "that" is the most mischievous word, metaphysically, in our language, is that it points to what-we-are as an object of what-we-are-not, whereas the reverse is the precise truth.
It is nefaste in that its use necessarily obliges the user to be speaking as a phenomenal object envisaging its own noumenality objectively.
Whereas the relative truth he is seeking is that PHENOMENA are just the objectification of noumenon, and therefore are "that" whose SUBJECT is "this".
---Wei Wu Wei
Thursday, April 15, 2010
"THIS"
What you are looking for is what is looking.
Why?
Because there IS
Nothing OTHER than that
(which is THIS).
Why?
Because there IS
Nothing OTHER than that
(which is THIS).
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
the voidness of apperceiving
"You" don't "get some thing";
"NO THING" "gets you"
(and "every thing else").
"NO THING" "gets you"
(and "every thing else").
Monday, April 12, 2010
"I am this which I am."
"I am that I am", said Jahweh
---which no doubt means "this which I am".
We too are "this which we are",
for THIS is everything
that ever was, is, or ever could be.
---Wei Wu Wei
---which no doubt means "this which I am".
We too are "this which we are",
for THIS is everything
that ever was, is, or ever could be.
---Wei Wu Wei
"We" don't have to look in order to "see" that "this" is wherever "we" happen to be.
An object is always over there;
The whereabouts of "this" is very precisely here.
An object is only in one place,
Whereas the situation of "this" is ubiquitous.
True, "this" is objectively absent,
But non-objectively "this" is eternally present.
---Wei Wu Wei
The whereabouts of "this" is very precisely here.
An object is only in one place,
Whereas the situation of "this" is ubiquitous.
True, "this" is objectively absent,
But non-objectively "this" is eternally present.
---Wei Wu Wei
Sunday, April 11, 2010
I, who am no thing---am every thing.
The world is illusory;
Brahman alone is Real;
Brahman is the world.
---Shankara
Brahman alone is Real;
Brahman is the world.
---Shankara
Thursday, April 8, 2010
"One, without a second"
Everything, absolutely EVERYTHING
IS the SAME
Awareness.
There can be
NOTHING OTHER than THIS
(no matter "what you do").
IS the SAME
Awareness.
There can be
NOTHING OTHER than THIS
(no matter "what you do").
Monday, April 5, 2010
"beyond knowledge and ignorance"
Q: How can one know the Self?
A: The Self always is. There is no knowing It.
It is not some new knowledge to be acquired.
What is new and not here and now
Cannot be permanent.
---Ramana Maharshi
A: The Self always is. There is no knowing It.
It is not some new knowledge to be acquired.
What is new and not here and now
Cannot be permanent.
---Ramana Maharshi
"this which I am"
Enlightenment is not a goal to achieve or an idea to grasp.
It is the timeless presence that you already are...
---Scott Kiloby
It is the timeless presence that you already are...
---Scott Kiloby
Saturday, April 3, 2010
castles made of mind
Whole-mind or Total-awareness
Transcends and includes
the body-mind's "point of perception
and conception."
Transcends and includes
the body-mind's "point of perception
and conception."
Friday, March 26, 2010
concepts, all concepts
Nothing has ever emerged from Source,
Therefore,
There is no Source.
---Dan Berkow
Therefore,
There is no Source.
---Dan Berkow
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Monday, March 22, 2010
"Judge not, lest ye be judged!"
A neo-Advaita version of Jesus' famous dictum might run something like this, "Judge not others, lest you also judge yourself!"
"Omni-presence"
No matter where you point, it's always there. But as soon as you grasp it as an object, it's NOT "IT."---Wayne Liquorman
Sunday, March 21, 2010
"Look, the Self is only Be-ing, not being this or that. It is simple Being."
NIRVANA is perfection. In the Perfect State there is neither subject nor object; there is nothing to see, nothing to feel, nothing to know. Seeing and knowing are the functions of the mind. In NIRVANA there is nothing but the blissful pure consciousness "I am."---Ramana Maharshi
Saturday, March 20, 2010
there IS no object (or subject)
In Non-duality there isn't anything. There's only something in duality. The only place something exists, is in duality.---Wayne Liquorman
Friday, March 19, 2010
"there's no there there"
We can apprehend that the processes of perception and conception require what we think of as "time" to take place. Thus we may notice that taking the "results" of these processes to be objectively existent, is drawing a veil of phenomenality (and separation) over our non-dual Noumenal Nature.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
"I am This, Here, Now!"
The apperceiving of "This"
Is just awakening from the dream
Of an objective universe
To the actuality of what is.
---Wei Wu Wei
Is just awakening from the dream
Of an objective universe
To the actuality of what is.
---Wei Wu Wei
Sunday, March 14, 2010
"seeing directly without inference or interpretation"
Did you see that?
Yes, of course.
Well, do you believe it?
Why do you ask?
Because for you seeing-is-believing,
For me seeing is---just SEEING.---Wei Wu Wei
Yes, of course.
Well, do you believe it?
Why do you ask?
Because for you seeing-is-believing,
For me seeing is---just SEEING.---Wei Wu Wei
Saturday, March 13, 2010
(ap)perceiving: without a perceiver or perceived
Perceiving non-inferentially,
Seeing the phenomenal universe as-it-is,
Without judgment,
Is perception of "suchness,"
Of "as-it-is-ness."
The subject of such an object
Is not then itself an object.
---Wei Wu Wei
Seeing the phenomenal universe as-it-is,
Without judgment,
Is perception of "suchness,"
Of "as-it-is-ness."
The subject of such an object
Is not then itself an object.
---Wei Wu Wei
Monday, March 8, 2010
the "Functioning of Totality"
EVERYTHING that "you're doing"
is IT.
Meanwhile,
you think you're doing
"something else."
is IT.
Meanwhile,
you think you're doing
"something else."
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
See-ING without a see-ER or any THING seen.
My seeing is the same as yours,
Only mine is uncluttered.---Tony Parsons
Only mine is uncluttered.---Tony Parsons
No amount of seeking can ever lead to Mind.---Huang Po
"You" cannot "see" Mind
Because "you" think "you" are looking.
And "you" cannot see LOOKING,
For Mind is what is looking, not "a" you.
No "you" could ever see Mind.
"You" removed---Mind is HERE.---Wei Wu Wei
Because "you" think "you" are looking.
And "you" cannot see LOOKING,
For Mind is what is looking, not "a" you.
No "you" could ever see Mind.
"You" removed---Mind is HERE.---Wei Wu Wei
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
