"Enlightenment" (or "What IS")
Indicates the Totality of Apperceiving
"wherein"
There is neither anyone to perceive,
Nor anything to be perceived.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(200)
-
▼
April
(29)
- castles made of mind
- "this which I am"
- "beyond knowledge and ignorance"
- "One, without a second"
- I, who am no thing---am every thing.
- "We" don't have to look in order to "see" that "th...
- "I am this which I am."
- the voidness of apperceiving
- hidden in plain sight
- "fact" derived from L facere, to make
- "THIS"
- "That"
- "direct, non-volitional apperceiving"
- pointing!
- "non-extension"
- What we are is not an entity extended in space and...
- partial vision
- "whole-seeing"
- "the Source and substance of all seeing"
- "embraced in obliterating Unity"
- no extending
- "all-embracing and inter-penetrating"
- experienc-ING is un-divided
- "All there IS is THIS"
- "to apperceive what, when, and where we are"
- not what we know, but what I AM
- "Knowing" without knower or known
- "we can be aware of what-we-are in the act of know...
- objecti-fiction
-
▼
April
(29)
"Obliterating unity" sounds interesting. Maybe it ties in with the YouTube video "The Collapse of Physicality" where Greg Goode discusses George Berkeley's saying, "to be is to be perceived." If there is no one to perceive, then there are no physical objects.
ReplyDeleteI prefer to talk about it this way: the "body-mind" and the "world" arise TOGETHER in whatever "This" is.
ReplyDelete"We" can call "It" Awareness, Apperceiving, Tao, etc., BUT we can't truly stand apart from It or any aspect of It.
We are not in a position to objectify any aspect of This as a separate "object."
The "world" doesn't get obliterated, only the "separateness and independence" of its aspects (which includes the "body-mind").
They can only seem to be "our objects" in the partial blindness of "divided seeing" (seeing "extended conceptually in space and time" from a personal point of view).